Signed-off-by: Alin-Gabriel Serdean
---
.mailmap| 4 ++--
AUTHORS.rst | 2 +-
MAINTAINERS.rst | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap
index 824af56b2..6cefe3cd4 100644
--- a/.mailmap
+++ b/.mailmap
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ Aaron Conole
Aa
This patch specifies the file digest algorithm for signtool on the package
and ovsext VS projects.
Fixes broken appveyor build.
Signed-off-by: Alin-Gabriel Serdean
---
datapath-windows/Package/package.VcxProj | 27
datapath-windows/ovsext/ovsext.vcxproj | 13 +
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:23:57AM -0700, Han Zhou wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I understand that we have difficulties for northd-ddlog progress, but I
> still want to try it before it goes away. I tested with the latest version,
> and it is super fast for most of the operations. With a large NB & SB
> cr
>> Dynamic lib still not supported yet in DPDK Windows).
- We have Dynamic LIB support. IIRC, it was upstreamed.
- Let's discuss in the DPDK bi-weekly to align
>> the userspace netdev datapath currently used by OVS-DPDK and AF_XDP,
currently only works on Linux platform.
- We have AF_XD
To adjust the minimum number of connection attempts by
ovsdb-server to the cloud controller (to avoid ddos when controller
was down and then up)
Was carefully tested within product's codestack
Signed-off-by: Anton Pryima
diff --git a/lib/jsonrpc.c b/lib/jsonrpc.c
index c8ce5362e..f7c5f17c1 1006
Hi all,
I have an issue with ovsdb in cluster mode when an instance of a db server
fails.
I'm running a HA single-stack IPv6 ovn-kubernetes Kind cluster, where we
have ovnnb_db and ovnsb_db replicated on three nodes. All control traffic
is IPv6.
Then I take one node, I delete the db files, and I
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 4:48 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 8:58 AM Frode Nordahl
> wrote:
> >
> > New lib/plug-provider module contains the infrastructure for
> > registering plug provider classes which may be hosted inside or
> > outside the core OVN repository.
> >
> > New
Currently, pyOpenSSL is half-deprecated upstream and so it's removed on
some distributions (for example on CentOS Stream 9,
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CS-336), but since OVS only
supports Python 3 it's possible to replace pyOpenSSL with "import ssl"
included in base Python 3.
Stream recv and
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 10:01 AM William Tu wrote:
> The patch adds OVS-DPDK supports on Windows.
Fantastic! I'm happy to see this work in progress. OVS(-DPDK) everywhere!
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/lis
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 6:52 AM Xavier Simonart wrote:
>
> Openflow tables OFTABLE_REMOTE_OUTPUT, OFTABLE_LOCAL_OUTPUT
> and OFTABLE_CHECK_LOOPBACK numbering changed, but documentation
> was not updated.
>
> Fixes: dd94f1266c ("northd: MAC learning: Add logical flows for fdb.")
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:46 PM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:39 AM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > I have not been actively maintaining OVN for some time now. I don't
> expect
> > that to change. I think that the responsible thing to do is to
> > acknowledge this properly by transitioni
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 4:53 AM Xavier Simonart wrote:
>
> Test was waiting for port to be up in SBDB before checking number of flows
> in OVS. However, there is no guarantee that all flows are installed
> in OVS when port is up. Test was randomly failing as some flows were
> installed, but not al
The patch adds OVS-DPDK supports on Windows.
Motivation
--
Currently OVS supports multiple datapath implementations: Linux kernel,
Windows kernel, userspace with OVS-DPDK Linux, and HW offload.
Adding any new feature to OVS datapath requires OS-specific expertise
and usually ends up with f
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 08:06:45PM -0700, William Tu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 8:05 PM William Tu wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 11:33 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:46 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:39 AM Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 11:20:48AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 09:32:41AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > It has been a long time since I've been able to devote significant time
> > to OVS work. I don't expect that to change. I think that the responsible
> > thing to do is to
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 10:06 AM Vladislav Odintsov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As far I know OVN 21.09.0 release previously was scheduled for 01.10.2021,
> but wasn't released yet.
> I’m wonder if my patch series is still scheduled to be in this release:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ovn/list/?se
From: Mohammad Heib
When the ovn controller receives an ip packet that targets a lport that has ACL
rule to reject ip packets, the controller will reply with TCP_RST or icmp4/6
unreachable packet
to notify the sender that the destination is not available.
In turn, the receiver host will receive
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 12:47 PM wrote:
>
> From: Remi Jouannet
>
> the options commit by fce20b8b73b1 were missing a description in ovs-ctl help
> message
>
> Fixes: fce20b8b73b1 ("ovs-ctl: Permit to specify additional options")
> Signed-off-by: Remi Jouannet
One minor comment, if you (already
From: Paolo Valerio
Date: 2021-10-05 06:04:57
To: we...@ucloud.cn,i.maxim...@ovn.org,acon...@redhat.com
Cc: d...@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] conntrack: limit port clash resolution attempts>not
a full review, but see some questions/remarks below.
>
>we...@ucloud.cn writes
remijouan...@gmail.com writes:
> From: Remi Jouannet
>
> the options commit by fce20b8b73b1 were missing a description in ovs-ctl help
> message
>
> Fixes: fce20b8b73b1 ("ovs-ctl: Permit to specify additional options")
> Signed-off-by: Remi Jouannet
> ---
Acked-by: Aaron Conole
_
Hi Alin,
I see that the AppVeyor builds are failing due to some issue with the
signtool options (and some warnings that might need to be addressed).
Can you have a look? Here is a sample output:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows
Kits\10\bin\10.0.22000.0\x86\signtool.exe sign /ph /sh
Thanks for everything Ben!
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 12:43 PM Kevin Traynor wrote:
> > @@ -489,6 +498,11 @@ dpdk_init__(const struct smap *ovs_other_config)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +#pragma GCC diagnostic push
> > +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-declarations"
> > +unixctl_command_register("dpdk/lc
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 09:32:41AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> It has been a long time since I've been able to devote significant time
> to OVS work. I don't expect that to change. I think that the responsible
> thing to do is to transition myself to emeritus status, with this patch.
>
> Signed-of
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 8:19 PM Aaron Conole wrote:
>
> Since 640d4db788ed ("ipf: Fix a use-after-free error, ...") the ipf
> framework unconditionally allocates a new dp_packet to track
> individual fragments. This prevents a use-after-free. However, an
> additional issue was present - even when
On 10/6/21 3:01 AM, Numan Siddique wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:47 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>>
>> Otherwise the S_ROUTER_IN_IP_INPUT aggregated flows that reply to ARP
>> requests targeting load balancer VIPs get completely regenerated every
>> time a new VIP/LB is added. This affects SB memo
26 matches
Mail list logo