On 1/6/22 15:00, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Ilya Maximets writes:
>
>> The fuzzing target times out if the action list is too big. And we
>> don't really need to fully parse all the actions just to say that they
>> are too big in the end. So, check early and exit.
>>
>> This is a pure performance
On 1/6/22 07:46, Pai G, Sunil wrote:
> Hi Eelco,
>
>>> - Could not find DPDK library in default search path, update
>>> + Failed to link with DPDK, check config.log for more details.
>>> + Could not find working DPDK library in default search path,
>>> + update
>>>
On 12/21/21 19:50, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 12/13/21 08:37, Sriharsha Basavapatna via dev wrote:
>> The hw_miss_packet_recover() API results in performance degradation, for
>> ports that are either not offload capable or do not support this specific
>> offload API.
>>
>> For example, in the test
On 12/22/21 06:38, Sriharsha Basavapatna wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 1:48 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>
>> On 10/30/21 09:04, Sriharsha Basavapatna wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 6:28 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
There are cases where users might want simple forwarding or drop rules
On Thu, 2021-12-30 at 08:03 +, Peng He wrote:
> considering a multi-thread PMD setting, when the frags are
> reassembled
> in one PMD, another thread might call *ipf_execute_reass_pkts* and
> 'steal'
> the reassembled packets into its ipf ctx, then this reassembled
> packet will enter into
On Sun, 2021-12-19 at 15:09 +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> ovsdb_datum_apply_diff_in_place() is much faster than the usual
> ovsdb_datum_apply_diff() in most cases, because it doesn't clone or
> compare unnecessary data. Since the original destination datum is
> destroyed anyway, we might use the
On Sun, 2021-12-19 at 15:09 +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> Even though relays can be scaled to the big number of servers to
> handle a lot more clients, lack of transaction history may cause
> significant load if clients are re-connecting.
> E.g. in case of the upgrade of a large-scale OVN
On Sun, 2021-12-19 at 15:09 +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> If a single transaction exceeds the size of the whole database (e.g.,
> a lot of rows got removed and new ones added), transaction history
> will
> be drained. This leads to sending UUID_ZERO to the clients as the
> last
> transaction id
Hello Ilya,
LGTM!
Acked-by: Mike Pattrick
On Sun, 2021-12-19 at 15:09 +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> Current code doesn't use the last id received in the monitor reply.
> That may result in re-downloading the database content if the
> re-connection happened after receiving the initial monitor
we...@ucloud.cn writes:
> From: wenxu
>
> Now, the default timeout policy for netdev datapath is hard codeing. In
> some case show or modify is needed.
> Add command for get/set default timeout policy. Using like this:
>
> ovs-appctl dpctl/ct-get-default-tp [dp]
> ovs-appctl
Hi Mark,
Thanks for looking into this patch.
> On 5 Jan 2022, at 22:01, Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I haven't done a full review of this patch, but I have noticed a problem
> pretty early on when I started looking.
>
> The new ip_in_lrp_networks() function that is added here is
On 7 Jan 2022, at 14:15, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 1/7/22 13:43, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7 Jan 2022, at 13:34, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Eelco,
>>>
>>> On 1/5/22 10:48, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
Currently, if a flow reply results in a message which exceeds
the maximum
On 1/7/22 13:43, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>
> On 7 Jan 2022, at 13:34, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>> Hi Eelco,
>>
>> On 1/5/22 10:48, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>> Currently, if a flow reply results in a message which exceeds
>>> the maximum reply size, it will assert OVS. This would happen
>>> when
On 6 Jan 2022, at 19:07, Aaron Conole wrote:
> This reverts commit c645550bb249 ("odp-util: Always report
> ODP_FIT_TOO_LITTLE for IGMP.")
>
> Always forcing a slow path action can result in some over-broad
> flows which swallow all traffic and force them to userspace, as reported
> in the
On 7 Jan 2022, at 13:34, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi Eelco,
>
> On 1/5/22 10:48, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>> Currently, if a flow reply results in a message which exceeds
>> the maximum reply size, it will assert OVS. This would happen
>> when OVN uses OpenFlow15 to add large flows, and they get
> -Original Message-
> From: David Marchand
> Sent: Thursday, January 6, 2022 10:42 AM
> To: Ilya Maximets
> Cc: Eelco Chaudron ; Eli Britstein
> ; ovs dev ; Richardson, Bruce
> ; Luca Boccassi ; Thomas
> Monjalon
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH dpdk-latest] ci: Remove
Its the same as nf_conntrack_put(), but without the
need for an indirect call. The downside is a module dependency on
nf_conntrack, but all of these already depend on conntrack anyway.
Cc: Paul Blakey
Cc: d...@openvswitch.org
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal
---
Hi Eelco,
On 1/5/22 10:48, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
Currently, if a flow reply results in a message which exceeds
the maximum reply size, it will assert OVS. This would happen
when OVN uses OpenFlow15 to add large flows, and they get read
using OpenFlow10 with ovs-ofctl.
This patch prevents this
On 1/7/22 07:25, Wentao Jia wrote:
>
> relay server inherit transaction historys from cluster source server
>
> Signed-off-by: Wentao Jia
> ---
> lib/ovsdb-cs.c | 1 +
> lib/ovsdb-cs.h | 1 +
> ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c | 4 +++-
> ovsdb/relay.c | 22 --
>
On 1/6/22 19:38, Mark Michelson wrote:
> On 12/23/21 14:40, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>> On 12/21/21 21:22, Numan Siddique wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 1:57 PM Han Zhou wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 9:31 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 4:29 PM Dumitru
Bleep bloop. Greetings Wentao Jia, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
WARNING: Line is 81 characters long (recommended limit is 79)
#89 FILE: ovsdb/relay.c:114:
probe interval of relay server can be configured from
"sb_global/nb_global options:relay_probe_interval"
minimum and default value is 5s
Signed-off-by: Wentao Jia
---
ovsdb/relay.c | 73 +++
1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)
diff --git
22 matches
Mail list logo
