On Thu, 10 Feb 2022, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:53:24 +0200 Paul Blakey wrote:
> > > The calls seem a little heavy for single byte replacements.
> > > Can you instead add a helper based on csum_replace4() maybe?
> > >
> > > BTW doesn't pedit have the same problem?
> >
> >
Bleep bloop. Greetings Peng He, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
ERROR: Author Peng He needs to sign off.
WARNING: Unexpected sign-offs from developers who are not
In the commit 1df7f7aac8c976690167261fec9a50d832ef9e7e, the packet
metadata's in_port has been changed from ofp port into odp port,
however, the odp->flow->in_port is still ofp_port. This patch changes
the odp->flow->in_port into odp_port.
Fixes: 1df7f7aac8 ("ofproto-dpif: Restore packet metadata
Ilya Maximets 于2022年2月12日周六 05:34写道：
> On 1/28/22 17:14, Aaron Conole wrote:
> > From: Peng He
> >
> > In the commit 1df7f7aac8c976690167261fec9a50d832ef9e7e, the packet
> > metadata's in_port has been changed from ofp port into odp port,
> > however, the odp->flow->in_port is still ofp_port.
Bleep bloop. Greetings Peng He, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
ERROR: Author Peng He needs to sign off.
WARNING: Unexpected sign-offs from developers who are not
From hepeng:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/20200717015041.82746-1-hepeng.0...@bytedance.com/#2487473
also from guohongzhi :
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/20200306130555.19884-1-guohongz...@huawei.com/
also from a discussion about the mixing use of
Great review!
Gaëtan Rivet 于2022年2月10日周四 22:01写道：
> On Sat, Feb 5, 2022, at 06:26, Peng He wrote:
> > From hepeng:
> >
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/20200717015041.82746-1-hepeng.0...@bytedance.com/#2487473
> >
> > also from guohongzhi :
> >
>
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for your reply.
Sorry about forgetting the cc, repost it.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 1:09 AM Kevin Traynor wrote:
>
> Hi Wan Junjie,
>
> On 27/01/2022 11:43, Wan Junjie wrote:
> > When assign a rxq to a pmd, the rxq will only be assigned to
> > the numa it belongs. An exception
