If ovs-tcpdump received HUP or TERM signal, mirror and mirror
interface should be destroyed. This often happens, when
controlling terminal is closed, like ssh session closed, and
other users use kill to terminate it.
Acked-by: Mike Pattrick
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ding
---
utilities/ovs-tcpdump.i
Excuse me,
This patch is invalid because of indentation.
On 2022/9/8 15:07, Daniel Ding wrote:
If ovs-tcpdump received HUP or TERM signal, mirror and mirror
interface should be destroyed. This often happens, when
controlling terminal is closed, like ssh session closed, and
other users use kill
If ovs-tcpdump received HUP or TERM signal, mirror and mirror
interface should be destroyed. This often happens, when
controlling terminal is closed, like ssh session closed, and
other users use kill to terminate it.
Acked-by: Mike Pattrick
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ding
---
utilities/ovs-tcpdump.i
CI Linux build script updated to use DPDK version 20.11.6.
Documentation updated to use DPDK version 20.11.6.
NEWS entry added for DPDK 20.11.6 validation.
Updated FAQ to recommend use of DPDK 20.11.6.
Signed-off-by: Michael Phelan
---
.ci/linux-build.sh | 2 +-
Documentation/f
CI Linux build script updated to use DPDK version 20.11.6.
Documentation updated to use DPDK version 20.11.6.
NEWS entry added for DPDK 20.11.6 validation.
Updated FAQ to recommend use of DPDK 20.11.6.
Signed-off-by: Michael Phelan
---
.ci/linux-build.sh | 2 +-
Documentation/f
CI linux build script updated to use DPDK version 21.11.2.
Documentation updated to use DPDK version 21.11.2.
NEWS entry added for DPDK 21.11.2 validation.
Updated FAQ to recommend use of DPDK 21.11.2.
Signed-off-by: Michael Phelan
---
.ci/linux-build.sh | 2 +-
Documentation/f
CI linux build script updated to use DPDk version 21.11.2.
Documentation updated to use DPDK version 21.11.2.
NEWS entry added for DPDK 21.11.2 validation.
Updated FAQ to recommend use of DPDK 21.11.2.
Signed-off-by: Michael Phelan
---
.ci/linux-build.sh | 2 +-
Documentation/f
CI Linux build script updated to use DPDK version 21.11.2.
Documentation updated to use DPDK version 21.11.2.
NEWS entry added for DPDK 21.11.2 validation.
Updated FAQ to recommend use of DPDK version 21.11.2.
Signed-off-by: Michael Phelan
---
.ci/linux-build.sh | 2 +-
Documen
Prior to this patch traffic to LSPs, which are disabled with
`ovn-nbctl lsp-set-enabled disabled` was dropped in the end of
lswitch egress pipeline. This means that traffic is processed in vain:
- traffic, which should be dropped, first travels from one chassis to
another (if source/dest LSPs r
Please, ignore this patch.
It contains errors, I’ll resend v2.
Regards,
Vladislav Odintsov
> On 8 Sep 2022, at 14:40, Vladislav Odintsov wrote:
>
> Prior to this patch traffic to LSPs, which are disabled with
> `ovn-nbctl lsp-set-enabled disabled` was dropped in the end of
> lswitch egress pip
Prior to this patch traffic to LSPs, which are disabled with
`ovn-nbctl lsp-set-enabled disabled` was dropped in the end of
lswitch egress pipeline. This means that traffic is processed in vain:
- traffic, which should be dropped, first travels from one chassis to
another (if source/dest LSPs r
northd doesn't process changes incrementally, so it makes sense to
accumulate more database updates and process them in bulk, so we can
cover everything in a single recompute.
ovsdb-server has a mechanism to start accumulating changes if the
client doesn't receive them fast enough, but it relies o
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 3:21 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 5:21 PM Ales Musil wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 1:21 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >
> > > Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077306
> > > Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara
> > > ---
> > > no
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 8:47 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 9/6/22 22:03, Han Zhou wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 6:42 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/31/22 16:59, Han Zhou wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 1:38 AM Dumitru Ceara
wrote:
>
> On 8/31/22 02:17, Han Zhou wrote:
Hi all,
We are planning on doing a system upgrade on our OVSCI automation
system this Friday 9/9/22.
This will affect our upstream robots (i.e. ovs, ovn, dpdk). This
affects patchwork sync and github actions sync, etc.
After the upgrade is completed the robots will be started again and
expected t
Thanks for the review and sorry for the late response.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 5:22 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> Hi Han,
>
> On 8/23/22 06:44, Han Zhou wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 3:41 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> >>
> >> The column was not tracked before while it should. The column includes
> >> m
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 6:02 AM Ales Musil wrote:
>
> The current behavior is that load balancers
> default to tcp protocol if it is not specified.
> However, this is not propagated to lflows which
> specify proto only when port is specified as part
> of the protocol e.g. udp.port == X. Always incl
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 4:12 AM Ales Musil wrote:
>
> We shouldn't run the MAC binding aging if the waker did not
> expire. This wouldn't cause any issue if the bulk removal limit
> is not configured. When the limit is configured and hit there
> will be some MAC bindings expired, just waiting for t
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 7:43 AM Han Zhou wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 6:02 AM Ales Musil wrote:
> >
> > The current behavior is that load balancers
> > default to tcp protocol if it is not specified.
> > However, this is not propagated to lflows which
> > specify proto only when port is sp
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 8:46 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> northd doesn't process changes incrementally, so it makes sense to
> accumulate more database updates and process them in bulk, so we can
> cover everything in a single recompute.
>
> ovsdb-server has a mechanism to start accumulating changes
20 matches
Mail list logo
