On 9/22/23 11:28, Kees Cook wrote:
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and
On 9/22/23 11:28, Kees Cook wrote:
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and
On 9/22/23 11:28, Kees Cook wrote:
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and
On 9/22/23 11:28, Kees Cook wrote:
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and
On 9/22/23 11:28, Kees Cook wrote:
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and
On 9/22/23 11:28, Kees Cook wrote:
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and
On 9/22/23 21:07, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 9/22/23 15:26, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 6/19/22 02:39, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> Open vSwitch system test suite is broken due to inability to
>>> load/unload netfilter modules. kworker thread is getting trapped
>>> in the infinite loop while running a
On 9/22/23 15:26, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 6/19/22 02:39, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> Open vSwitch system test suite is broken due to inability to
>> load/unload netfilter modules. kworker thread is getting trapped
>> in the infinite loop while running a net cleanup inside the
>>
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 7:31 AM Vladislav Odintsov
wrote:
>
> Hi Dumitru,
>
> if eventually this patch got merged, please remove next lines from its
commit message:
>
> "Disablement for ovs-vswitchd -> ovn-controller OF inacivity probing will
> be done in the next patch."
>
> Unfortunately I was
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:28:56AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:28:56AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array
Bleep bloop. Greetings Kees Cook, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
Patch skipped due to previous failure.
Please check this out. If you feel there has been an error, please
Bleep bloop. Greetings Kees Cook, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
Patch skipped due to previous failure.
Please check this out. If you feel there has been an error, please
Bleep bloop. Greetings Kees Cook, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
Patch skipped due to previous failure.
Please check this out. If you feel there has been an error, please
Bleep bloop. Greetings Kees Cook, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
Patch skipped due to previous failure.
Please check this out. If you feel there has been an error, please
Bleep bloop. Greetings Kees Cook, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
Patch skipped due to previous failure.
Please check this out. If you feel there has been an error, please
Bleep bloop. Greetings Kees Cook, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
Patch skipped due to previous failure.
Please check this out. If you feel there has been an error, please
Bleep bloop. Greetings Kees Cook, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
Patch skipped due to previous failure.
Please check this out. If you feel there has been an error, please
Bleep bloop. Greetings Kees Cook, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
git-am:
error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (include/net/ip_fib.h).
error: could not build fake
Bleep bloop. Greetings Kees Cook, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
Patch skipped due to previous failure.
Please check this out. If you feel there has been an error, please
Hi Vladislav,
(Sorry I didn't notice your update until now when reading the discussion of
your OVN patch)
I think a simple solution is to update the hardcoded 60s probe in OVS to 0,
for the pre-created punix mgmt controller.
We could make it configurable, but it may not make much sense since it
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
Hi,
This is the batch 1 of patches touching netdev for preparing for
the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
Without using the setting, ovn-controllers will fail to create their
tunnel ports pointing to the same remote chassis due to identical
configuration used (same remote_ips and no different in local_ips).
The error observed then is:
```
2023-08-01T13:55:37.772Z|00050|tunnel|WARN|ovn-hv3-0:
On 15 Sep 2023, at 6:36, Brad Cowie wrote:
> ofconn connection parameters, such as probe_interval and max_backoff,
> are always set to their default values when vswitchd starts up even if
> the user has configured these to be something different in ovsdb:
>
> $ ovs-vsctl set controller UUID
On 6/19/22 02:39, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> Open vSwitch system test suite is broken due to inability to
> load/unload netfilter modules. kworker thread is getting trapped
> in the infinite loop while running a net cleanup inside the
> nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list, because deferred skbuffs are
OVN unit tests highlight this:
ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 1344 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
0 0x4db0b7 in calloc (ovsdb/ovsdb-server+0x4db0b7)
1 0x5c2162 in xcalloc__ lib/util.c:124:31
2 0x5c221c in xcalloc lib/util.c:161:12
3 0x54afbc in
On 9/22/23 14:21, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> If OVN is started less than 30 seconds after system boot, it logs:
>
> |memory_trim|WARN|Detected last active timestamp overflow
>
> The 'now < trim_timeout_ms' is not for a timestamp overflow, but
> for the later subtraction. 'now < last_active_ms' is
If OVN is started less than 30 seconds after system boot, it logs:
|memory_trim|WARN|Detected last active timestamp overflow
The 'now < trim_timeout_ms' is not for a timestamp overflow, but
for the later subtraction. 'now < last_active_ms' is enough to
check for the overflow.
Technically, we
On 5 Sep 2023, at 12:17, Faicker Mo via dev wrote:
> The warning message is
Hi Faicker, thanks for the patch!
> |1|tc(handler4)|WARN|can't offload rewrite of IP/IPV6 with ip_proto: X.
>
> IPIP and GRE only need the checksum recalculation of the IP header if the
> IP header is rewritten.
>
>
On 5 Sep 2023, at 12:17, Faicker Mo via dev wrote:
> When the IP header is rewritten like NAT or ttl/tos changed,
> the csum of IP header need recalculation. The UDPLITE checksum
> needs recalculation if src or dst changed in IP header.
> The tc-csum action is for this.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On 5 Sep 2023, at 12:17, Faicker Mo via dev wrote:
Hi Faicker,
Thanks for this patch series! I have some comments below.
> When the IP header is rewritten like NAT or ttl/tos changed,
> the csum of IP header need recalculation. The UDPLITE checksum
> needs recalculation if src or dst changed in
Hi
Thanks Ilya for the review.
Comments below. I'll send a v2
Xavier
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 9:05 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 9/20/23 19:28, Xavier Simonart wrote:
> > OVN unit tests highlight this:
> >
> > ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
> > Direct leak of 1344 byte(s) in 1
Hello Dumitru and Team,
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 5:25 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As you probably know and as the ovn.org website mentions [0] we have
> weekly OVN IRC meetings, in #openvswitch on irc.libera.chat (the time is
> slightly wrong but that's a different issue [1]).
>
> In
On 21 Sep 2023, at 21:42, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> do_execute_actions() function can be called recursively multiple
> times while executing actions that require pipeline forking or
> recirculations. It may also be re-entered multiple times if the packet
> leaves openvswitch module and re-enters
On 21 Sep 2023, at 21:42, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> do_execute_actions() function can be called recursively multiple
> times while executing actions that require pipeline forking or
> recirculations. It may also be re-entered multiple times if the packet
> leaves openvswitch module and re-enters
49 matches
Mail list logo
