Looks a little odd: 'HAVE_NF_CONNTRACK_L3PROATO_H'
You may want a follow up patch:
s/HAVE_NF_CONNTRACK_L3PROATO_H/HAVE_NF_CONNTRACK_L3PROTO_H
On 5/10/19, 12:31 PM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Yifeng
Sun"
wrote:
Upstream kernel commit a0ae2562 ("netfilter: conntrack:
If TCP packets do not go thru conntrack, then that would explain why the TCP
traffic is not natted (since you don't have any other rules that could do that)
You need to find out where the TCP packets are going.
Try making the rules L4 protocol specific (i.e. look for TCP and also do
something
I thought the problem was with TCP/UDP traffic ?
Did you send TCP traffic for this test ?; if not, can you run the test with TCP
?
On 2/8/19, 12:53 PM, "Rostyslav Fridman" wrote:
# ovs-appctl dpif/dump-flows br-int
Could you dump the datapath flows and conntrack entries while your test is
running (i.e. sending packets) ?
==
# ovs-appctl dpif/dump-flows br-int
==
# ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-conntrack
Also besides arp, could you limit
We have advanced system tests for userspace datapath to test OVN, including tcp
packets.
system-ovn
124: ovn -- 2 LRs connected via LS, gateway router, SNAT and DNAT ok
125: ovn -- 2 LRs connected via LS, gateway router, easy SNAT ok
126: ovn -- multiple gateway routers, SNAT and DNAT ok
127:
Thanks Vishal
Yes, it needs to go back to 2.6; I will be doing some backport patches soon.
Darrell
On 2/1/19, 8:57 PM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Vishal Deep
Ajmera" wrote:
>
> 'conn_key_extract()' in userspace conntrack is including L2
> (Ethernet) pad bytes
On 2/4/19, 12:24 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 07:52:18PM +, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
> On 2/4/19, 11:15 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Ben
Pfaff" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 02:15:27PM -0800, Darrell Ball wrote:
On 2/4/19, 11:23 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Ben Pfaff"
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:49:03AM -0800, Darrell Ball wrote:
> The new api will be used in a subsequent patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrell Ball
I think that this could use some
On 2/4/19, 11:15 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Ben Pfaff"
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 02:15:27PM -0800, Darrell Ball wrote:
> There are a few cases where padding may be undefined according to
> the C standard. Practically, it seems implementations don't
On 2/4/19, 8:53 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Aaron
Conole" wrote:
Darrell Ball writes:
> There are a few cases where padding may be undefined according to
> the C standard. Practically, it seems implementations don't have issue,
> but it is better
I would like to wait for David to return, so please hold off for now.
On 1/22/19, 3:58 PM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Ben Pfaff"
wrote:
It looks like you have some changes to both patches, will you post a v5?
Is this series otherwise ready to go (do you have
On 1/14/19, 4:49 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of David
Marchand" wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 7:32 AM Darrell Ball wrote:
> Thanks for the patch
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 7:33 AM David Marchand
> wrote:
>
> The ftp alg deals with
12 matches
Mail list logo
