cut a (alpha / beta) tag.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On 11/13/20 6:54 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 11/13/20 1:47 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 11/12/20 5:09 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>>> Source: openvswitch
>>> Version: 2.13.0+dfsg1-12
>>> Severity: normal
>>> X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-dpdk-de...
in Buster that often
crashes). I don't want this to happen again.
Please get the release team in the loop, therefore, and make them
pre-approve such a plan, by opening a bug with them.
Also, I would very much like to have OVS and OVN being packaged and
maintain
Hi Ben and others,
I just want to know: does OVS 2.10 has support for IPv6 mac learning /
NDP, so that we can avoid the ipv6 broadcast storm in our cloud?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
P.S: I'm not registered to this list, please CC me.
__
, and how I should package it. The only
way I could do it would be cheating by reading what has been done in
Ubuntu. That's not the way I want to continue doing the work. I don't
really get what is the difference between OVS and OVN as well.
So, definitively, please continue to help!
Cheers
ixed anyway.
I tried to build the tip of the 2.8 branch in a Debian porter box, and
these tests are failing as well.
2 RC bugs were reported in Debian:
https://bugs.debian.org/880508
https://bugs.debian.org/880509
Could someone have a look and help me fix these bugs?
Cheer
On 11/01/2017 02:58 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Ben, could you investigate? I've uploaded to Unstable a version with the
> patch above, because it's the last blocker to have the last OpenStack
> dependency approved in the NEW queue. Let me know if you think we need
> to wo
rather than in OVS itself.)
>
> There's now a failure on hppa, too, which bears investigation. I'll try
> to look at that soon.
Ben, could you investigate? I've uploaded to Unstable a version with the
patch above, because it's the last blocker to have t
th you. Did you
read the debian/changelog? I removed lots of binary packages that were
not technically needed, because that's best practice in Debian (ie: the
FTP masters recommend this). All of them have a Provides: equivalent.
This also simplifies packaging a lot (ie: all /usr/bin things
s.
Is that fine for you? I'm starting...
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Package: python-openvswitch
Severity: wishlist
Hi Ben (and others?),
OpenStack Pike needs ovs >= 2.7.0. We're about to release it to Debian unstable,
as it is currently staging in Experimental. Please package this ASAP.
Cheers,
Thomas Goira
11 matches
Mail list logo
