Thanks Mark and Lorenzo for the quick root cause and fix! Can you please
also apply to 20.12? We will need to backport this fix to older OCP
versions (4.8z and 4.7z).
Tim Rozet
Red Hat OpenShift Networking Team
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 4:40 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
> I applied this to m
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:21 AM Han Zhou wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 2:17 PM Lorenzo Bianconi <
> lorenzo.bianc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Increase priority for automatic routes (routes created assigning IP
> > addresses to OVN logical router interfaces) in order to always prefer
>
"eth1 169.254.169.2"} ...or something
like that
Thoughts?
Tim Rozet
Red Hat OpenShift Networking Team
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
etdev mode and claims that kernel
data path with multiple OVS will not work:
https://github.com/vmware-tanzu/antrea/issues/14
https://github.com/vmware-tanzu/antrea/blob/master/docs/kind.md#why-is-the-yaml-manifest-different-when-using-kind
Would appreciate if anyone has any insights on this.
T
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815217#c12
Tim Rozet
Red Hat CTO Networking Team
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 11:47 AM Aaron Conole wrote:
> Ben Pfaff writes:
>
> > If I'm interpreting this correctly, then it sounds like OVS does
> > work with SCTP. If so, and if OVN does
I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815217 to track this
issue.
Tim Rozet
Red Hat CTO Networking Team
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 3:11 PM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:27:52AM -0400, Mark Michelson wrote:
> > I've recently been working on adding support
),ct_label(0/0x1),eth(),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(dst=169.254.33.2,proto=132,frag=no),sctp(dst=31769),
packets:1, bytes:98, used:3.885s, actions:hash(l4(0)),recirc(0xfd)
Notice the match contains "+new" but there is no new session here. I'm
using openvswitch-2.12.0-1.fc31.x86_64.
Thanks,
Tim
