On 12/7/21 16:36, Mohammad Heib wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
> Thank you for reviewing the patches.
>
> i fully agree that is a code duplication but I wasn't sure if I can
> include those files in nlmon code since those are kernel-headers files.
> so I sent an email to OVS-DISCUSS mailing list but didn't
Hi Ilya,
Thank you for reviewing the patches.
i fully agree that is a code duplication but I wasn't sure if I can
include those files in nlmon code since those are kernel-headers files.
so I sent an email to OVS-DISCUSS mailing list but didn't get a
helpful answer:
email link:
https://www.mail-ar
On 11/22/21 00:39, Mohammad Heib wrote:
> These two patches aim to make nlmon tool more generic
> and extend its functionality to support TC flowers/actions
> monitoring and parsing.
>
> This change will improve the visibility of the communication
> between the OVS and the TC subsystem and can be
These two patches aim to make nlmon tool more generic
and extend its functionality to support TC flowers/actions
monitoring and parsing.
This change will improve the visibility of the communication
between the OVS and the TC subsystem and can be used for debugging
and testing OVS HW offload commun
