The news is good, thanks!
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 12:09 PM Omar Cardona wrote:
> Hi *Ben,*
>
>- Yes, definitely. C11/C17 stdatomic.h is high on the list.
>- Our current critical path item for MSVC DPDK support is TLS.
>
>
>
> Hi *Thomas,*
>
>- I will setup some time next week to dis
Hi Ben,
* Yes, definitely. C11/C17 stdatomic.h is high on the list.
* Our current critical path item for MSVC DPDK support is TLS.
Hi Thomas,
* I will setup some time next week to discuss alignment and share our
proposed MSVC plan.
From: Ben Pfaff
Sent: Thursday, November 4, 202
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:37 AM Omar Cardona wrote:
> > > f. With clang support on Windows, can we remove MSVC?
>
> Please no. We are actively working with the MSVC team to extend support
> for DPDKs dependencies
>
Could you get them to implement C11 atomics? The MSVC support for atomic
operatio
>> (Dynamic lib still not supported yet in DPDK Windows).
This is dependent on TLS support, where a workaround PoC is avail, but not yet
upstreamed.
> > Windows DPDK library hasn't finished all its library/driver porting to
> > Windows.
Our focus is primarily the DPDK libraries which support U
