Hi Anurag,
On 16/03/2022 12:29, Anurag Agarwal wrote:
Hello Kevin,
Thanks for your inputs.
In this scenario we have one VM each on NUMA0 and NUMA1 (VM1 is on NUMA0, VM2
is on NUMA1), dpdk port is on NUMA1.
Without cross-numa-polling, VM/VHU queue traffic is evenly distributed based on
Hello Kevin,
Thanks for your inputs.
In this scenario we have one VM each on NUMA0 and NUMA1 (VM1 is on NUMA0, VM2
is on NUMA1), dpdk port is on NUMA1.
Without cross-numa-polling, VM/VHU queue traffic is evenly distributed based on
load on their respective NUMA sockets.
However, DPDK
On 04/03/2022 17:57, Anurag Agarwal wrote:
Hello Kevin,
I have prepared a patch for "per port cross-numa-polling" and
attached herewith.
The results are captured in 'cross-numa-results.txt'. We see PMD to RxQ
assignment evenly balanced across all PMDs with this patch.
Please take
Hi Jan,
On 09/03/2022 15:48, Jan Scheurich wrote:
Thanks for sharing your experience with it. My fear with the proposal is that
someone turns this on and then tells us performance is worse and/or OVS
assignments/ALB are broken, because it has an impact on their case.
In terms of limiting possib
> Thanks for sharing your experience with it. My fear with the proposal is that
> someone turns this on and then tells us performance is worse and/or OVS
> assignments/ALB are broken, because it has an impact on their case.
>
> In terms of limiting possible negative effects,
> - it can be opt-in a
Hello Kevin,
I have prepared a patch for "per port cross-numa-polling" and
attached herewith.
The results are captured in 'cross-numa-results.txt'. We see PMD to RxQ
assignment evenly balanced across all PMDs with this patch.
Please take a look and let us know your inputs.
Please
Hi Jan,
On 17/02/2022 14:21, Jan Scheurich wrote:
Hi Kevin,
We have done extensive benchmarking and found that we get better overall
PMD load balance and resulting OVS performance when we do not statically
pin any rx queues and instead let the auto-load-balancing find the optimal
distribution
Hi Kevin,
> > We have done extensive benchmarking and found that we get better overall
> PMD load balance and resulting OVS performance when we do not statically
> pin any rx queues and instead let the auto-load-balancing find the optimal
> distribution of phy rx queues over both NUMA nodes to bal
Hi Jan,
On 14/02/2022 10:54, Jan Scheurich wrote:
We do acknowledge the benefit of non-pinned polling of phy rx queues by
PMD threads on all NUMA nodes. It gives the auto-load balancer much better
options to utilize spare capacity on PMDs on all NUMA nodes.
Our patch proposed in
https://prote
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 6:54 PM Jan Scheurich
wrote:
>
> > > We do acknowledge the benefit of non-pinned polling of phy rx queues by
> > PMD threads on all NUMA nodes. It gives the auto-load balancer much better
> > options to utilize spare capacity on PMDs on all NUMA nodes.
> > >
> > > Our patch
> > We do acknowledge the benefit of non-pinned polling of phy rx queues by
> PMD threads on all NUMA nodes. It gives the auto-load balancer much better
> options to utilize spare capacity on PMDs on all NUMA nodes.
> >
> > Our patch proposed in
> > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-50
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 6:12 PM Jan Scheurich
wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Btw, this patch is similar in functionality to the one posted by
> > > Anurag [0] and there was also some discussion about this approach here
> > > [1].
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for pointing this out.
> > IMO, setting interface cross-
> >
> > Btw, this patch is similar in functionality to the one posted by
> > Anurag [0] and there was also some discussion about this approach here [1].
> >
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
> IMO, setting interface cross-numa would be good for phy port but not good for
> vhu. Since vhu can be de
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for your reply.
Sorry about forgetting the cc, repost it.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 1:09 AM Kevin Traynor wrote:
>
> Hi Wan Junjie,
>
> On 27/01/2022 11:43, Wan Junjie wrote:
> > When assign a rxq to a pmd, the rxq will only be assigned to
> > the numa it belongs. An exception is
14 matches
Mail list logo
