On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 01:25:57PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> > 2. Do we need a vote of the committers to approve this change? I
>> >think that I would be more comfortable if
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 01:25:57PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > 2. Do we need a vote of the committers to approve this change? I
> >think that I would be more comfortable if we did have one.
>
> Yes, I think that would be best.
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:19:04PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> This patch introduces an Emeritus status for OVS committers. An
>> Emeritus Committer is recognized as having made a significant impact
>> to the project and having been a committ
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:19:04PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
> This patch introduces an Emeritus status for OVS committers. An
> Emeritus Committer is recognized as having made a significant impact
> to the project and having been a committer in the past. It is
> intended as an option for those
This patch introduces an Emeritus status for OVS committers. An
Emeritus Committer is recognized as having made a significant impact
to the project and having been a committer in the past. It is
intended as an option for those that do not currently have the time or
interest to fulfill committer re
