On 4/5/24 11:15, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>
> On 4 Apr 2024, at 21:17, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 2:36 AM Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3 Apr 2024, at 23:18, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>>>
Before the patch, the size of the backlog depended on the type of
On 4 Apr 2024, at 21:17, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 2:36 AM Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 3 Apr 2024, at 23:18, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>>
>>> Before the patch, the size of the backlog depended on the type of socket
>>> (UNIX vs INET) as well as on the language (C vs
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 2:36 AM Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>
> On 3 Apr 2024, at 23:18, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> > Before the patch, the size of the backlog depended on the type of socket
> > (UNIX vs INET) as well as on the language (C vs Python), specifically:
> >
> > - python used backlog size
On 3 Apr 2024, at 23:18, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Before the patch, the size of the backlog depended on the type of socket
> (UNIX vs INET) as well as on the language (C vs Python), specifically:
>
> - python used backlog size = 10 for all sockets;
> - C used 64 for UNIX sockets but 10 for
Before the patch, the size of the backlog depended on the type of socket
(UNIX vs INET) as well as on the language (C vs Python), specifically:
- python used backlog size = 10 for all sockets;
- C used 64 for UNIX sockets but 10 for INET sockets.
This consolidates the values across the board. It
