On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 09:13:08AM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 30.11.2017 20:42, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 03:55:03PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >> Current implementation of manual padding inside struct cmap_bucket
> >> doesn't work for some cacheline sizes. For example,
On 30.11.2017 20:42, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 03:55:03PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> Current implementation of manual padding inside struct cmap_bucket
>> doesn't work for some cacheline sizes. For example, if CACHE_LINE_SIZE
>> equals to 128, compiler adds an additional 8
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 03:55:03PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> Current implementation of manual padding inside struct cmap_bucket
> doesn't work for some cacheline sizes. For example, if CACHE_LINE_SIZE
> equals to 128, compiler adds an additional 8 bytes: 4 bytes between
> 'hashes' and 'nodes'
Current implementation of manual padding inside struct cmap_bucket
doesn't work for some cacheline sizes. For example, if CACHE_LINE_SIZE
equals to 128, compiler adds an additional 8 bytes: 4 bytes between
'hashes' and 'nodes' and 4 bytes after the manual 'pad'. This leads to
build time assertion,
