On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 09:12:10PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> On 14/07/2021 19:33, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 05:36:36PM +0100, anton.iva...@cambridgegreys.com
> > wrote:
> > > From: Anton Ivanov
> > >
> > > There is no point to add 512 bytes on the stack
> > > every time lat
On 14/07/2021 19:33, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 05:36:36PM +0100, anton.iva...@cambridgegreys.com wrote:
From: Anton Ivanov
There is no point to add 512 bytes on the stack
every time latch is polled. Alignment, cache line thrashing,
etc - you name it.
Do you have evidence this i
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 05:36:36PM +0100, anton.iva...@cambridgegreys.com wrote:
> From: Anton Ivanov
>
> There is no point to add 512 bytes on the stack
> every time latch is polled. Alignment, cache line thrashing,
> etc - you name it.
Do you have evidence this is a real problem?
> The result
From: Anton Ivanov
There is no point to add 512 bytes on the stack
every time latch is polled. Alignment, cache line thrashing,
etc - you name it.
The result of the read is discarded anyway so the buffer
can be shared by all latches.
Signed-off-by: Anton Ivanov
---
lib/latch-unix.c | 7 --
