On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 09:23:08PM -0800, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 26 November 2017 at 17:41, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > scan_u128() should return 0 on an error but it actually returned an errno
> > value in some cases, so a command like this:
> > ovs-appctl dpctl/add-flow 'ct_label(1/55
On 26 November 2017 at 17:41, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> scan_u128() should return 0 on an error but it actually returned an errno
> value in some cases, so a command like this:
> ovs-appctl dpctl/add-flow 'ct_label(1/55)' ''
> could cause a buffer overread.
>
> This bug is not
scan_u128() should return 0 on an error but it actually returned an errno
value in some cases, so a command like this:
ovs-appctl dpctl/add-flow 'ct_label(1/55)' ''
could cause a buffer overread.
This bug is not as severe as it may sound because the string form of ODP
f
