Oops. I sent a fix:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/942271/
I forgot to add you in Reported-by but I'll do that before pushing.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 06:44:15PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
> Hi Ben and Mark,
>
> This patch broke 2.9 build over here, see below.
>
> On Tue, Jul 1
Hi Ben and Mark,
This patch broke 2.9 build over here, see below.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 02:24:46PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Done.
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:41:32AM -0400, Mark Michelson wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > Thanks for applying this patch to master. Can you please apply the patch
Done.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:41:32AM -0400, Mark Michelson wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thanks for applying this patch to master. Can you please apply the patch to
> the 2.9 branch as well?
>
> Thank you,
> Mark
>
> On 06/26/2018 02:45 PM, Mark Michelson wrote:
> >A note: if approved, this patch wi
Hi Ben,
Thanks for applying this patch to master. Can you please apply the patch
to the 2.9 branch as well?
Thank you,
Mark
On 06/26/2018 02:45 PM, Mark Michelson wrote:
A note: if approved, this patch will also need to go into version 2.9
On 06/26/2018 02:42 PM, Mark Michelson wrote:
When
A note: if approved, this patch will also need to go into version 2.9
On 06/26/2018 02:42 PM, Mark Michelson wrote:
When configuring a router port to have a redirect-chassis and using an
IPv6 load balancer rule that specifies a TCP/UDP port, load balancing
would not work as expected. This is bec
When configuring a router port to have a redirect-chassis and using an
IPv6 load balancer rule that specifies a TCP/UDP port, load balancing
would not work as expected. This is because a rule to un-dnat the return
traffic from the load balancer destination was not installed. This is
because this ru
