From: Numan Siddique
Presently, the icmp4 requests to the router gateway ip are sent to the
connectiont tracker, but the icmp4 reply packets responded by
'lr_in_ip_input' stage are not sent to the connection tracker.
Also no zone ids are assigned for the router ports. Because of which
the icmp4 r
Hi Darrell and Daniele, do one of you have an opinion on whether this is
the right approach?
Thanks,
Ben.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:29:14AM +0530, nusid...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Numan Siddique
>
> Presently, the icmp4 requests to the router gateway ip are sent to the
> connectiont tracker
I'm also looking at this one. I was trying to review today, but have
been slowed down by getting an OpenStack test environment working for
testing this and looking closer.
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Hi Darrell and Daniele, do one of you have an opinion on whether this is
Daniele and I discussed
1) Seems ok in that there is security at the VM LP so weakening the
Check at the router port for ICMP seems ok.
2) The same applies to V6 ?
Thanks
On 3/8/17, 1:32 PM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Ben Pfaff"
wrote:
Hi Darrell and Daniele, do one
Thanks for the review and comments.
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Darrell Ball wrote:
> Daniele and I discussed
>
> 1) Seems ok in that there is security at the VM LP so weakening the
> Check at the router port for ICMP seems ok.
> 2) The same applies to V6 ?
>
I need to test this before c
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:59 AM, wrote:
> From: Numan Siddique
>
> Presently, the icmp4 requests to the router gateway ip are sent to the
> connectiont tracker, but the icmp4 reply packets responded by
> 'lr_in_ip_input' stage are not sent to the connection tracker.
> Also no zone ids are assig
Thanks for the review. Please see inline.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:59 AM, wrote:
> > From: Numan Siddique
> >
> > Presently, the icmp4 requests to the router gateway ip are sent to the
> > connectiont tracker, but the icmp4 reply pac
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Numan Siddique
wrote:
> Thanks for the review. Please see inline.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:59 AM, wrote:
>> > From: Numan Siddique
>> >
>> > Presently, the icmp4 requests to the router gatewa
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Numan Siddique wrote:
> Thanks for the review. Please see inline.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:59 AM, wrote:
>> > From: Numan Siddique
>> >
>> > Presently, the icmp4 requests to the router gateway
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> Thanks for the review. Please see inline.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:59 AM, wrote:
>>> > From: Numan Siddiq
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> I don't think it's a Neutron issue.
>>
>> I see the conntrack entry remaining in the UNREPLIED state, even in
>> the workin
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Numan Siddique
> wrote:
> >> I don't think it's a Neutron issue.
> >>
> >> I see the
- Original Message -
> From: "Numan Siddique"
> To: "Russell Bryant"
> Cc: "ovs dev"
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 11:21:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovn-northd: Skip icmp4 packets destined for
> router ports from conntrac
11:21:33 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovn-northd: Skip icmp4 packets destined
> for router ports from conntrack
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Russell Bryant
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Russell Bryant
> wrote:
&
14 matches
Mail list logo
