On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 7:33 PM Cong Wang wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:59 AM Tyler J. Stachecki
> wrote:
> >
> > As of "ovs: clear skb->tstamp in forwarding path", the
> > tstamp is now being cleared unconditionally to fix fq qdisc
> > operation with ovs vports.
> >
> > While this is
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:44 PM Tyler Stachecki
wrote:
> Sorry if this is a no-op -- I'm admittedly not familiar with this part
> of the tree. I had added this check based on this discussion on the
> OVS mailing list:
>
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:59 AM Tyler J. Stachecki
wrote:
>
> As of "ovs: clear skb->tstamp in forwarding path", the
> tstamp is now being cleared unconditionally to fix fq qdisc
> operation with ovs vports.
>
> While this is mostly correct and fixes forwarding for that
> use case, a slight
As of "ovs: clear skb->tstamp in forwarding path", the
tstamp is now being cleared unconditionally to fix fq qdisc
operation with ovs vports.
While this is mostly correct and fixes forwarding for that
use case, a slight adjustment is necessary to ensure that
the tstamp is cleared *only when the