Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] redhat: fix upgrades where group doesn't exist

2017-08-30 Thread Russell Bryant
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote: > On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:18:14 -0400 > Aaron Conole wrote: > >> The upgrade from older Open vSwitch versions on RHEL will try, as much as >> possible, to preserve the system. This means no new users or groups are >> created. As an effect, i

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] redhat: fix upgrades where group doesn't exist

2017-08-30 Thread Flavio Leitner
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:18:14 -0400 Aaron Conole wrote: > The upgrade from older Open vSwitch versions on RHEL will try, as much as > possible, to preserve the system. This means no new users or groups are > created. As an effect, it's possible for the chown to fail, because the > hugetlbfs grou

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] redhat: fix upgrades where group doesn't exist

2017-08-30 Thread Aaron Conole
Aaron Conole writes: > The upgrade from older Open vSwitch versions on RHEL will try, as much as > possible, to preserve the system. This means no new users or groups are > created. As an effect, it's possible for the chown to fail, because the > hugetlbfs group may not exist. While it did on

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] redhat: fix upgrades where group doesn't exist

2017-08-14 Thread Aaron Conole
The upgrade from older Open vSwitch versions on RHEL will try, as much as possible, to preserve the system. This means no new users or groups are created. As an effect, it's possible for the chown to fail, because the hugetlbfs group may not exist. While it did on my systems, it was not there on