Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] socket: Increase listen backlog to 128 everywhere.

2024-08-02 Thread Ilya Maximets
On 6/6/24 18:02, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 11:12 AM Ihar Hrachyshka > wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 11:17 AM Brian Haley > wrote: > > Hi Ilya, > > On 6/4/24 6:27 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote: >

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] socket: Increase listen backlog to 128 everywhere.

2024-06-06 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 11:12 AM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 11:17 AM Brian Haley wrote: > >> Hi Ilya, >> >> On 6/4/24 6:27 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote: >> > On 6/4/24 11:54, Alin Serdean wrote: >> >> Does it make sense to make this configurable via automake in order to >> avoid

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] socket: Increase listen backlog to 128 everywhere.

2024-06-06 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 11:17 AM Brian Haley wrote: > Hi Ilya, > > On 6/4/24 6:27 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote: > > On 6/4/24 11:54, Alin Serdean wrote: > >> Does it make sense to make this configurable via automake in order to > avoid > >> future patches if we need to bump the value further? > > > >

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] socket: Increase listen backlog to 128 everywhere.

2024-06-05 Thread Brian Haley
Hi Ilya, On 6/4/24 6:27 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote: On 6/4/24 11:54, Alin Serdean wrote: Does it make sense to make this configurable via automake in order to avoid future patches if we need to bump the value further? I'm still not convinced this is an issue worth fixing. The original

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] socket: Increase listen backlog to 128 everywhere.

2024-06-04 Thread Ilya Maximets
On 6/4/24 11:54, Alin Serdean wrote: > Does it make sense to make this configurable via automake in order to avoid > future patches if we need to bump the value further? I'm still not convinced this is an issue worth fixing. The original discussion is here:

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] socket: Increase listen backlog to 128 everywhere.

2024-06-04 Thread Alin Serdean
Does it make sense to make this configurable via automake in order to avoid future patches if we need to bump the value further? On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 11:05 AM Simon Horman wrote: > + Ihar > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 03:40:08PM -0400, Brian Haley wrote: > > An earlier patch [1] increased the

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] socket: Increase listen backlog to 128 everywhere.

2024-06-04 Thread Simon Horman
+ Ihar On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 03:40:08PM -0400, Brian Haley wrote: > An earlier patch [1] increased the size of the listen > backlog to 64. While that was a huge improvement over > 10, further testing in large deployments showed 128 > was even better. nit: I would slightly prefer if a commit

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] socket: Increase listen backlog to 128 everywhere.

2024-05-31 Thread Brian Haley
An earlier patch [1] increased the size of the listen backlog to 64. While that was a huge improvement over 10, further testing in large deployments showed 128 was even better. Looking at 'ss -lmt' output over more than one week for port 6641, captured across three different controllers, the