On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 04:00:34PM -0800, Mickey Spiegel wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:17:19PM -0800, Mickey Spiegel wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 04:00:34PM -0800, Mickey Spiegel wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:17:19PM -0800, Mickey Spiegel wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:17:19PM -0800, Mickey Spiegel wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:29:49PM -0800, Mickey Spiegel wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 20,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:17:19PM -0800, Mickey Spiegel wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:29:49PM -0800, Mickey Spiegel wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > >
> > > > I believe
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:29:49PM -0800, Mickey Spiegel wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > I believe that, with these patches, egress loopback as proposed by Mickey's
> > patches can be implemented with:
> > clone { inport = outport; outport = "";
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I believe that, with these patches, egress loopback as proposed by Mickey's
> patches can be implemented with:
> clone { inport = outport; outport = ""; flags.loopback = 0;
> reg0 = 0; reg1 = 0; ... regN = 0;
>
I believe that, with these patches, egress loopback as proposed by Mickey's
patches can be implemented with:
clone { inport = outport; outport = ""; flags.loopback = 0;
reg0 = 0; reg1 = 0; ... regN = 0;
next(pipeline=ingress, table=0); }
Ben Pfaff (10):
actions: Fix