On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:26:35AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 08:57:36 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> > > Since the element count member must be set before accessing the annotated
> > > flexible array member, some patches also move the member's initialization
> > > earlier. (These
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski :
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:28:42 -0700 you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the batch 1 of patches touching netdev for preparing for
> the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array m
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 08:57:36 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> > Since the element count member must be set before accessing the annotated
> > flexible array member, some patches also move the member's initialization
> > earlier. (These are noted in the individual patches.)
>
> Hi, just checking on this
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:28:42AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> This is the batch 1 of patches touching netdev for preparing for
> the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at
Hi,
This is the batch 1 of patches touching netdev for preparing for
the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing)
