Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] netdev-vport: reject concomitant incompatible tunnels

2017-07-10 Thread Eelco Chaudron
On 10/07/17 14:03, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 06:47:21AM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: ... However the interface ports for VXLAN have to be unique on the same destination port, i.e. they need a different VNI. Looking at the datapath code (only Lin

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] netdev-vport: reject concomitant incompatible tunnels

2017-07-10 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 06:47:21AM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:19:49AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > > On 07/07/2017 08:32 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 11:09:08AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > > > > This is a follow up patch for a

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] netdev-vport: reject concomitant incompatible tunnels

2017-07-10 Thread Eelco Chaudron
On 10/07/17 11:47, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:19:49AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote: On 07/07/2017 08:32 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 11:09:08AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote: This is a follow up patch for an earlier patch send by Cascardo, howe

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] netdev-vport: reject concomitant incompatible tunnels

2017-07-10 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:19:49AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > On 07/07/2017 08:32 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 11:09:08AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > > > This is a follow up patch for an earlier patch send by Cascardo, > > > however I think this patch might not be needed.

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] netdev-vport: reject concomitant incompatible tunnels

2017-07-10 Thread Eelco Chaudron
On 07/07/2017 08:32 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 11:09:08AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote: This is a follow up patch for an earlier patch send by Cascardo, however I think this patch might not be needed... This patch will make sure VXLAN tunnels with and without the group based po

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] netdev-vport: reject concomitant incompatible tunnels

2017-07-07 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 11:09:08AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > This is a follow up patch for an earlier patch send by Cascardo, > however I think this patch might not be needed... > > This patch will make sure VXLAN tunnels with and without the group > based policy (gbp) option enabled can not

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] netdev-vport: reject concomitant incompatible tunnels

2017-06-09 Thread Eelco Chaudron
This is a follow up patch for an earlier patch send by Cascardo, however I think this patch might not be needed... This patch will make sure VXLAN tunnels with and without the group based policy (gbp) option enabled can not coexist on the same destination udp port. However the interface ports for