Thanks for taking care of it Ilya!
Alin.
Sent from phone
> On 3 Jul 2023, at 14:59, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 7/1/23 01:55, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> On 7/1/23 01:43, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> On 6/8/23 12:07, Alin Serdean wrote:
Ack, I will try to see if I can get GH actions.
It
On 7/1/23 01:55, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 7/1/23 01:43, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 6/8/23 12:07, Alin Serdean wrote:
>>> Ack, I will try to see if I can get GH actions.
>>> It would also be better to have everything integrated in one place.
>>>
>>> I remember the discussion and the PR… I had some
On 7/1/23 01:43, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 6/8/23 12:07, Alin Serdean wrote:
>> Ack, I will try to see if I can get GH actions.
>> It would also be better to have everything integrated in one place.
>>
>> I remember the discussion and the PR… I had some comments which never got
>> addressed.
>>
On 6/8/23 12:07, Alin Serdean wrote:
> Ack, I will try to see if I can get GH actions.
> It would also be better to have everything integrated in one place.
>
> I remember the discussion and the PR… I had some comments which never got
> addressed.
>
> Windows is pretty slow when starting
Ack, I will try to see if I can get GH actions.
It would also be better to have everything integrated in one place.
I remember the discussion and the PR… I had some comments which never got
addressed.
Windows is pretty slow when starting processes ,especially if the builtin AV is
not disabled
On 6/8/23 11:01, Alin Serdean wrote:
>
> Ack. I will try to see if I can address it by the end of the week.
>
> Thanks for clarifying the questions.
>
> Would GH actions be better than appveyor?
Functionally, I don't think they are that much different.
But GHA is better integrated into our CI,
Ack. I will try to see if I can address it by the end of the week.
Thanks for clarifying the questions.
Would GH actions be better than appveyor?
—
Alin.
On 2 Jun 2023, at 12:25, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 6/1/23 13:50, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> On 5/31/23 23:05, Alin Serdean wrote:
>>>
On 6/1/23 13:50, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 5/31/23 23:05, Alin Serdean wrote:
>>
>> That makes sense.
>>
>> We can leverage the following commit:
>>
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/20201013124655.1408-1-aserd...@cloudbasesolutions.com/
>>
>>
On 5/31/23 23:05, Alin Serdean wrote:
>
> That makes sense.
>
> We can leverage the following commit:
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/20201013124655.1408-1-aserd...@cloudbasesolutions.com/
>
>
That makes sense.
We can leverage the following commit:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/20201013124655.1408-1-aserd...@cloudbasesolutions.com/
But I still need to fix the permissions. I’ll try to find some time and address
it.
I remember there were some discussions to
On 5/31/23 22:36, Alin Serdean wrote:
>
> It would be best to change the link with the latest version of OpenSSL. That
> will ensure there are no mishaps .
I think the problem here is that slproweb.com only provides
OpenSSL 1.1.1+ right now and our build system doesn't work
with that version.
It would be best to change the link with the latest version of OpenSSL. That
will ensure there are no mishaps .
Alin.
>
> On 31 May 2023, at 21:23, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> OpenSSL is already available in the exact location we need it [1].
> Also, the download itself fails for a long time
OpenSSL is already available in the exact location we need it [1].
Also, the download itself fails for a long time already, because
the version we're trying to download is not available.
[1] https://www.appveyor.com/docs/windows-images-software/#tools
Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
---
13 matches
Mail list logo
