subject:"\[ovs\-dev\] \[PATCH 1\/2\] ovs\-fields\: Correct ideas about which OXM classes are official."

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ovs-fields: Correct ideas about which OXM classes are official.

2018-05-24 Thread Justin Pettit

> On May 18, 2018, at 10:16 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > The purpose of including an OpenFlow version in the notes in meta-flow.h > and ovs-fields.7 is to explain what version of OpenFlow standardized a > given field. NXOXM_* are not standardized so they should not have an > OpenFlow version. This

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ovs-fields: Correct ideas about which OXM classes are official.

2018-05-18 Thread Ben Pfaff

The purpose of including an OpenFlow version in the notes in meta-flow.h and ovs-fields.7 is to explain what version of OpenFlow standardized a given field. NXOXM_* are not standardized so they should not have an OpenFlow version. This commit corrects it. Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff --- build-aux