> "Stokes, Ian" writes:
>
> >> The normal way of retrieving the running DPDK status involves parsing
> >> log files and issuing various incantations of ovs-vsctl and
> >> ovs-appctl commands to determine whether the rte_eal_init successfully
> started.
> >>
> >> This commit
"Stokes, Ian" writes:
>> The normal way of retrieving the running DPDK status involves parsing log
>> files and issuing various incantations of ovs-vsctl and ovs-appctl
>> commands to determine whether the rte_eal_init successfully started.
>>
>> This commit adds two new
> The normal way of retrieving the running DPDK status involves parsing log
> files and issuing various incantations of ovs-vsctl and ovs-appctl
> commands to determine whether the rte_eal_init successfully started.
>
> This commit adds two new records to reflect the dpdk version, and the dpdk
>
On 05/03/2018 08:08 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> The normal way of retrieving the running DPDK status involves parsing
> log files and issuing various incantations of ovs-vsctl and ovs-appctl
> commands to determine whether the rte_eal_init successfully started.
>
> This commit adds two new records
The normal way of retrieving the running DPDK status involves parsing
log files and issuing various incantations of ovs-vsctl and ovs-appctl
commands to determine whether the rte_eal_init successfully started.
This commit adds two new records to reflect the dpdk version, and
the dpdk