Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/3] system-dpdk: Don't require hugetlbfs.

2023-01-26 Thread Aaron Conole
David Marchand writes: > dpdk-testpmd does not need hugetlbfs backing as we don't require > multiprocess support in OVS unit tests. > Plus, there is no need for explicitly reserving more memory than what > testpmd would actually need at runtime. > > Switch to --in-memory, use dynamic allocations

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/3] system-dpdk: Don't require hugetlbfs.

2023-01-23 Thread David Marchand
dpdk-testpmd does not need hugetlbfs backing as we don't require multiprocess support in OVS unit tests. Plus, there is no need for explicitly reserving more memory than what testpmd would actually need at runtime. Switch to --in-memory, use dynamic allocations and remove the then unneeded check o