On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 9:40 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 1/1/24 07:37, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 9:03 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >>
> >> In case the difference between 'old' and 'new' rows is readily
> >> available, it can be used to construct added/removed datums
> >> ins
On 1/1/24 07:37, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 9:03 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>
>> In case the difference between 'old' and 'new' rows is readily
>> available, it can be used to construct added/removed datums
>> instead. Diffs are typically much smaller than the column
>> itself.
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 9:03 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> In case the difference between 'old' and 'new' rows is readily
> available, it can be used to construct added/removed datums
> instead. Diffs are typically much smaller than the column
> itself. This change more than doubles the performanc
In case the difference between 'old' and 'new' rows is readily
available, it can be used to construct added/removed datums
instead. Diffs are typically much smaller than the column
itself. This change more than doubles the performance of a
transaction replay.
For example, with this change applie
