On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 02:28:03PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 03.01.2020 00:54, William Tu wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 5:22 PM Yi Yang (杨燚)-云服务集团
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> William, maybe you don't know that kind of tap interface you're saying
> >> only can be used for VM, that is why ope
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 5:28 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 03.01.2020 00:54, William Tu wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 5:22 PM Yi Yang (杨燚)-云服务集团
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> William, maybe you don't know that kind of tap interface you're saying
> >> only can be used for VM, that is why openvswitch
On 03.01.2020 00:54, William Tu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 5:22 PM Yi Yang (杨燚)-云服务集团
> wrote:
>>
>> William, maybe you don't know that kind of tap interface you're saying only
>> can be used for VM, that is why openvswitch has to introduce internal type
>> for the case I'm saying.
There
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 5:22 PM Yi Yang (杨燚)-云服务集团 wrote:
>
> William, maybe you don't know that kind of tap interface you're saying only
> can be used for VM, that is why openvswitch has to introduce internal type
> for the case I'm saying.
>
> In OVS DPDK case, if you create the below interfac
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 4:35 PM Yi Yang (杨燚)-云服务集团 wrote:
>
> Thanks William, af_packet only can open tap interface, it can't create tap
> interface. Tap interface onlu can be created by the below way
>
> ovs-vsctl add-port tapX -- set interface tapX type=internal
>
> this tap is very special, it
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 01:14:37PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 09:49:44AM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 08:44:30PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 04:41:25PM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> > > > Currently the performance of sending pack
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 09:49:44AM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 08:44:30PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 04:41:25PM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> > > Currently the performance of sending packets from userspace
> > > ovs to kernel veth device is pretty bad as
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 08:44:30PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 04:41:25PM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> > Currently the performance of sending packets from userspace
> > ovs to kernel veth device is pretty bad as reported from YiYang[1].
> > The patch adds AF_PACKET v3, tpacket v
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 04:41:25PM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> Currently the performance of sending packets from userspace
> ovs to kernel veth device is pretty bad as reported from YiYang[1].
> The patch adds AF_PACKET v3, tpacket v3, as another way to
> tx/rx packet to linux device, hopefully show
Currently the performance of sending packets from userspace
ovs to kernel veth device is pretty bad as reported from YiYang[1].
The patch adds AF_PACKET v3, tpacket v3, as another way to
tx/rx packet to linux device, hopefully showing better performance.
AF_PACKET v3 should get closed to 1Mpps, as
10 matches
Mail list logo
