> >>> Meson is a nice system in many aspects, but its support for tests is very
> >>> limited. IIUC, it can only run a single binary and check the error codes.
> >>> Most of our tests starts several daemons and performs several fairly
> >>> complex
> >>> operations and checks. I'm afraid that we
On 8/10/21 4:43 PM, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev On Behalf Of William Tu
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 1:00 AM
>> To: Ilya Maximets
>> Cc: ; Sergey Madaminov
>>
>> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC 0/1] use
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of William Tu
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 1:00 AM
> To: Ilya Maximets
> Cc: ; Sergey Madaminov
>
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC 0/1] use meson and ninja as a build system
> for ovs
>
> Hi Ilya,
Hi Ilya,
Thanks for your feedback!
> Hi, Sergey and William. Thanks for working on this.
>
> I think that it might be a good idea to move to a different build system
> that will not be that painful to run on Windows. I'm not working on
> Windows parts, but it would be great to have a fast CI th
On 8/8/21 3:49 AM, Sergey Madaminov wrote:
> This RFC proposes to replace current, autotools-based, build system with
> meson.
> It won't break the current build system process, which will allow for a
> gradual transition.
> Furthermore, the new build system will natively work across multiple
>
This RFC proposes to replace current, autotools-based, build system with meson.
It won't break the current build system process, which will allow for a gradual
transition.
Furthermore, the new build system will natively work across multiple operating
systems (now it compiles on both Windows and L
