On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 9:52 AM David Miller wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang
> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 07:21:33 +0800
>
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 6:52 AM David Miller wrote:
> >
> >> From: xiangxia.m@gmail.com
> >>
> >> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 18:09:22 +0800
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > Decrease tab
From: Tonghao Zhang
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 07:21:33 +0800
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 6:52 AM David Miller wrote:
>
>> From: xiangxia.m@gmail.com
>>
>> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 18:09:22 +0800
>>
>>
>>
>> > Decrease table->count and ufid_count unconditionally,
>>
>>
>>
>> You don't explain why t
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 6:52 AM David Miller wrote:
> From: xiangxia.m@gmail.com
>
> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 18:09:22 +0800
>
>
>
> > Decrease table->count and ufid_count unconditionally,
>
>
>
> You don't explain why this is a valid transformation.
>
>
>
> Is it a bug fix?
No
>
>
>
> Can it
From: xiangxia.m@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 18:09:22 +0800
> Decrease table->count and ufid_count unconditionally,
You don't explain why this is a valid transformation.
Is it a bug fix?
Can it never happen?
What are the details and how did you determine this?
From: Tonghao Zhang
Decrease table->count and ufid_count unconditionally,
and add BUG_ON in flush flows function.
Cc: Pravin B Shelar
Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang
---
net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 19 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/open