On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:42:40PM +0800, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:52:41 +0800, Yang, Yi wrote:
> > > + return ((ret != 0) ? false : true);
> >
> > But I don't think this is a problematic line from my understanding,
>
> Why not:
>
> return ((ret != 0 == true) ? false :
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:52:41 +0800, Yang, Yi wrote:
> > + return ((ret != 0) ? false : true);
>
> But I don't think this is a problematic line from my understanding,
Why not:
return ((ret != 0 == true) ? false : true) == true;
?
Sigh. This is equal to:
return !ret;
which
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 07:05:34PM +0800, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:47:16 +0800, Yi Yang wrote:
> > + return ((ret != 0) ? false : true);
Jiri, I appriciate your review very carefully and professionally from my
heart for 10 versions, that is really very very big effort.
I
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:47:16 +0800, Yi Yang wrote:
> + return ((ret != 0) ? false : true);
I'm not going to review this version but this caught my eye - I pointed
out this silly construct in my review of v9. I can understand that
working late in the night and rewriting the code back and
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:47:16 +0800, Yi Yang wrote:
> v9->v10
> - Change struct ovs_key_nsh to
>struct ovs_nsh_key_base base;
>__be32 context[NSH_MD1_CONTEXT_SIZE];
> - Fix new comments for v9
NAK, we haven't finished the discussion for v9 yet. It's not
appropriate to send a new
v9->v10
- Change struct ovs_key_nsh to
struct ovs_nsh_key_base base;
__be32 context[NSH_MD1_CONTEXT_SIZE];
- Fix new comments for v9
v8->v9
- Fix build error reported by daily intel build
because nsh module isn't selected by openvswitch
v7->v8
- Rework nested value and mask
