> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 5:31 PM Lorenzo Bianconi
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Lorenzo!
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Mark Michelson
> > >
> > > The only question I have is why you converted to a shash instead of a
> > > smap?
> >
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > Thx for the review. Do you mean shash instead of
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 5:31 PM Lorenzo Bianconi
wrote:
>
> > Thanks Lorenzo!
> >
> > Acked-by: Mark Michelson
> >
> > The only question I have is why you converted to a shash instead of a smap?
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thx for the review. Do you mean shash instead of sset?
>
> Regards,
> Lorenzo
>
> Thanks Lorenzo!
>
> Acked-by: Mark Michelson
>
> The only question I have is why you converted to a shash instead of a smap?
Hi Mark,
Thx for the review. Do you mean shash instead of sset?
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> On 11/4/22 09:08, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Introduce the capability to
Thanks Lorenzo!
Acked-by: Mark Michelson
The only question I have is why you converted to a shash instead of a smap?
On 11/4/22 09:08, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
Introduce the capability to apply QoS rules for logical switch ports
claimed by ovn-controller. Rely on shash instead of sset for
Introduce the capability to apply QoS rules for logical switch ports
claimed by ovn-controller. Rely on shash instead of sset for
egress_ifaces.
Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129742
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi
---
controller/binding.c| 78
