Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH ovn] northd: Change the default value of ignore_lsp_down to true.

2023-08-24 Thread Jakub Libosvar
> On Aug 24, 2023, at 12:18 PM, Han Zhou wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 5:34 AM Jakub Libosvar wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > we use OpenStack (Neutron) as CMS and we have some customers reporting > > problems with their use case because of this change. I was wondering about > > the

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH ovn] northd: Change the default value of ignore_lsp_down to true.

2023-08-24 Thread Han Zhou
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 5:34 AM Jakub Libosvar wrote: > > Hello, > > we use OpenStack (Neutron) as CMS and we have some customers reporting problems with their use case because of this change. I was wondering about the benefits described below in the commit message, are there any public data that

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH ovn] northd: Change the default value of ignore_lsp_down to true.

2023-08-24 Thread Jakub Libosvar
Hello, we use OpenStack (Neutron) as CMS and we have some customers reporting problems with their use case because of this change. I was wondering about the benefits described below in the commit message, are there any public data that back up the statements about the control plane cost at scal

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH ovn] northd: Change the default value of ignore_lsp_down to true.

2021-10-04 Thread Numan Siddique
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 4:56 PM Mark Michelson wrote: > > On 10/4/21 4:10 PM, Han Zhou wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:30 AM Numan Siddique > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 1:37 PM Han Zhou > > wrote: > > > > > > > > O

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH ovn] northd: Change the default value of ignore_lsp_down to true.

2021-10-04 Thread Mark Michelson
On 10/4/21 4:10 PM, Han Zhou wrote: On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:30 AM Numan Siddique > wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 1:37 PM Han Zhou > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:10 AM Mark Gray > wrote: > > >

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH ovn] northd: Change the default value of ignore_lsp_down to true.

2021-10-04 Thread Han Zhou
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:30 AM Numan Siddique wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 1:37 PM Han Zhou wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:10 AM Mark Gray wrote: > > > > > > On 02/10/2021 08:11, Han Zhou wrote: > > > > The current default behavior is that ARP responder flows for VIFs are > > > >

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH ovn] northd: Change the default value of ignore_lsp_down to true.

2021-10-04 Thread Numan Siddique
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 1:37 PM Han Zhou wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:10 AM Mark Gray wrote: > > > > On 02/10/2021 08:11, Han Zhou wrote: > > > The current default behavior is that ARP responder flows for VIFs are > > > added by northd after the port-binding state is UP, which creates more

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH ovn] northd: Change the default value of ignore_lsp_down to true.

2021-10-04 Thread Han Zhou
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:10 AM Mark Gray wrote: > > On 02/10/2021 08:11, Han Zhou wrote: > > The current default behavior is that ARP responder flows for VIFs are > > added by northd after the port-binding state is UP, which creates more > > trouble than benefit in most use cases. To make the defa

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH ovn] northd: Change the default value of ignore_lsp_down to true.

2021-10-04 Thread Mark Gray
On 02/10/2021 08:11, Han Zhou wrote: > The current default behavior is that ARP responder flows for VIFs are > added by northd after the port-binding state is UP, which creates more > trouble than benefit in most use cases. To make the default behavior > desirable for majority of the use cases, set

[ovs-dev] [PATCH ovn] northd: Change the default value of ignore_lsp_down to true.

2021-10-02 Thread Han Zhou
The current default behavior is that ARP responder flows for VIFs are added by northd after the port-binding state is UP, which creates more trouble than benefit in most use cases. To make the default behavior desirable for majority of the use cases, set the option ignore_lsp_down to true by defaul