On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 1:11 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 5/23/23 10:09, Ales Musil wrote:
> > The incremental processing is broken for addresses
> > that have mask which could "erase" portion of the address
> > itself e.g. 10.16.0.47/4, after applying the mask with token
> > parser the address b
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 7:11 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 5/23/23 10:09, Ales Musil wrote:
> > The incremental processing is broken for addresses
> > that have mask which could "erase" portion of the address
> > itself e.g. 10.16.0.47/4, after applying the mask with token
> > parser the address
On 5/23/23 10:09, Ales Musil wrote:
> The incremental processing is broken for addresses
> that have mask which could "erase" portion of the address
> itself e.g. 10.16.0.47/4, after applying the mask with token
> parser the address becomes 0.0.0.0/4, which is fine for
> logical flows. However, for
The incremental processing is broken for addresses
that have mask which could "erase" portion of the address
itself e.g. 10.16.0.47/4, after applying the mask with token
parser the address becomes 0.0.0.0/4, which is fine for
logical flows. However, for the deletion/addition to database
we need the
