On 3/28/24 15:19, Frode Nordahl wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 3:03 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>>
>> On 3/18/24 22:21, Mark Michelson wrote:
>>> Thanks Frode, looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Mark Michelson
>>>
>>> On 3/18/24 07:43, Frode Nordahl wrote:
The current code puts the contents
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 3:03 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 3/18/24 22:21, Mark Michelson wrote:
> > Thanks Frode, looks good to me.
> >
> > Acked-by: Mark Michelson
> >
> > On 3/18/24 07:43, Frode Nordahl wrote:
> >> The current code puts the contents of the ``ipb6_ra_pd_list``
> >> option
On 3/18/24 22:21, Mark Michelson wrote:
> Thanks Frode, looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Mark Michelson
>
> On 3/18/24 07:43, Frode Nordahl wrote:
>> The current code puts the contents of the ``ipb6_ra_pd_list``
>> option verbatim into the ``ipv6_ra_prefixes`` option.
>>
>> This does not work,
Thanks Frode, looks good to me.
Acked-by: Mark Michelson
On 3/18/24 07:43, Frode Nordahl wrote:
The current code puts the contents of the ``ipb6_ra_pd_list``
option verbatim into the ``ipv6_ra_prefixes`` option.
This does not work, because the ``ipv6_ra_pd_list`` is not an IPv6
prefix, but a
The current code puts the contents of the ``ipb6_ra_pd_list``
option verbatim into the ``ipv6_ra_prefixes`` option.
This does not work, because the ``ipv6_ra_pd_list`` is not an IPv6
prefix, but a string composed of aid:prefix/length, and as a
consequence the controller would log a message like
