> On 4/28/23 15:57, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > In the current codebase for distributed gw router port use-case,
> > it is not possible to add a load balancer that redirects the traffic
> > to a backed if it is even the internal IP of a FIP NAT rule since
> > the reply traffic is never centralized.
On 4/28/23 15:57, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> In the current codebase for distributed gw router port use-case,
> it is not possible to add a load balancer that redirects the traffic
> to a backed if it is even the internal IP of a FIP NAT rule since
> the reply traffic is never centralized. Fix the i
In the current codebase for distributed gw router port use-case,
it is not possible to add a load balancer that redirects the traffic
to a backed if it is even the internal IP of a FIP NAT rule since
the reply traffic is never centralized. Fix the issue centralizing the
traffic if it is the reply p
