> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 5:05 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
> >
> > Acked-by: Mark Michelson
> >
> > I have a small nit below, but since it's strictly with a comment, it's
> > easy for whoever merges this to correct the comment when they do it.
> > There's no reason to spin up a new version of this.
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 5:05 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Michelson
>
> I have a small nit below, but since it's strictly with a comment, it's
> easy for whoever merges this to correct the comment when they do it.
> There's no reason to spin up a new version of this.
>
> On 5/4/21 1
Acked-by: Mark Michelson
I have a small nit below, but since it's strictly with a comment, it's
easy for whoever merges this to correct the comment when they do it.
There's no reason to spin up a new version of this.
On 5/4/21 1:59 PM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
Since the localnet port is avail
Since the localnet port is available on each hv, do not forward traffic
to the localnet port if it is present in order to avoid switch fdb
misconfiguration.
Related bz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942877
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi
---
controller/physical.c| 23 +
