On 8/29/23 04:49, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
On 8/21/23 19:33, Mark Michelson wrote:
Hi Dumitru,
I have one finding in the test code, but other than that it looks good.
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the review!
On 8/17/23 11:25, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
This is beneficial in a few ways:
- first, it reduces
On 8/21/23 19:33, Mark Michelson wrote:
> Hi Dumitru,
>
> I have one finding in the test code, but other than that it looks good.
>
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the review!
> On 8/17/23 11:25, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>> This is beneficial in a few ways:
>> - first, it reduces the number of different types
Hi Dumitru,
I have one finding in the test code, but other than that it looks good.
On 8/17/23 11:25, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
This is beneficial in a few ways:
- first, it reduces the number of different types of data the northd
I-P node has to process.
- it turns out the northd I-P node (whose
This is beneficial in a few ways:
- first, it reduces the number of different types of data the northd
I-P node has to process.
- it turns out the northd I-P node (whose recompute is rather costly)
doesn't really depend on meters or ACLs.
- prepares the ground for a pure I-P implementation for
