On 2/24/22 11:29, Numan Siddique wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:17 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
On 2/23/22 19:39, Numan Siddique wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 7:22 AM Frode Nordahl
wrote:
Hello Mark,
This overall looks great, it also looks like you addressed Numan's
comments from the prev
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:17 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> On 2/23/22 19:39, Numan Siddique wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 7:22 AM Frode Nordahl
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Mark,
> >>
> >> This overall looks great, it also looks like you addressed Numan's
> >> comments from the previous iterat
On 2/23/22 19:39, Numan Siddique wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 7:22 AM Frode Nordahl
wrote:
Hello Mark,
This overall looks great, it also looks like you addressed Numan's
comments from the previous iteration.
I have added a nit in-line to save you from a conversation with 0-day
/ checkpatch
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 7:22 AM Frode Nordahl
wrote:
>
> Hello Mark,
>
> This overall looks great, it also looks like you addressed Numan's
> comments from the previous iteration.
>
> I have added a nit in-line to save you from a conversation with 0-day
> / checkpatch.
>
> In addition to reviewing
Hello Mark,
This overall looks great, it also looks like you addressed Numan's
comments from the previous iteration.
I have added a nit in-line to save you from a conversation with 0-day
/ checkpatch.
In addition to reviewing I took your patch for a ride and it works as expected.
Would you perh
Bleep bloop. Greetings Mark Michelson, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
git-am:
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed
It can be desirable for replies to stateful ACLs to be logged. And in
some cases, it can actually be a bit confusing why they aren't logged.
Consider a situation where a port group called "port_group" exists and
logical switch ports swp1 and swp2 belong to it. We create the following
ACL, where log
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 8:27 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> It can be desirable for replies to stateful ACLs to be logged. And in
> some cases, it can actually be a bit confusing why they aren't logged.
> Consider a situation where a port group called "port_group" exists and
> logical switch ports sw
It can be desirable for replies to stateful ACLs to be logged. And in
some cases, it can actually be a bit confusing why they aren't logged.
Consider a situation where a port group called "port_group" exists and
logical switch ports swp1 and swp2 belong to it. We create the following
ACL, where log
