> > > > Hi
> > > > Thanks for your review. I test it with openflow, It works fine because
> > > > the *revalidator
> > > > will clean up the flows(which may be offloaded).
> > > > > In case above scenario leaves ufids in OVS that cannot be removed,
> > > > > I'd suggest
> > > > > reverting of the
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:41 PM Tonghao Zhang wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:18 PM Simon Horman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 04:25:21PM +0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 7:13 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 6/14/20 1:40 PM, Tonghao Zhang wrot
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:18 PM Simon Horman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 04:25:21PM +0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 7:13 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6/14/20 1:40 PM, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 1:31 PM Roi Dayan wrote:
> > > >>
>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 04:25:21PM +0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 7:13 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >
> > On 6/14/20 1:40 PM, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 1:31 PM Roi Dayan wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 2020-06-11 1:36 PM, xiangxia.m@gmail.com
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 7:13 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 6/14/20 1:40 PM, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 1:31 PM Roi Dayan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2020-06-11 1:36 PM, xiangxia.m@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> From: Tonghao Zhang
> >>>
> >>> When ports were removed from bri
On 6/14/20 1:40 PM, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 1:31 PM Roi Dayan wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2020-06-11 1:36 PM, xiangxia.m@gmail.com wrote:
>>> From: Tonghao Zhang
>>>
>>> When ports were removed from bridge, we should flush the
>>> offload rules on the ports. The main reason i
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 1:31 PM Roi Dayan wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020-06-11 1:36 PM, xiangxia.m@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Tonghao Zhang
> >
> > When ports were removed from bridge, we should flush the
> > offload rules on the ports. The main reason is two factors:
> >
> > * The ports removed from
On 2020-06-11 1:36 PM, xiangxia.m@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tonghao Zhang
>
> When ports were removed from bridge, we should flush the
> offload rules on the ports. The main reason is two factors:
>
> * The ports removed from bridge, will be managed by OvS, so
> flush the rules which ins
Bleep bloop. Greetings Tonghao Zhang, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
ERROR: Co-author Wengang Hou needs to sign off.
Lines checked: 48, Warnings: 0, Errors: 1
P
From: Tonghao Zhang
When ports were removed from bridge, we should flush the
offload rules on the ports. The main reason is two factors:
* The ports removed from bridge, will be managed by OvS, so
flush the rules which installed by OvS.
* If using the TC flower offload, for example, tc rules s
10 matches
Mail list logo
