Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH ovs v2] debian/rules: Fix incorrect use of link-time optimizer.

2024-01-08 Thread Aaron Conole
(re-added the list) Roberto Bartzen Acosta writes: > Hi Aaron, > > I tried to send a new revision but I think that my Gmail web interface > is putting some additional formatting even if I paste using > . > Do you recommend any tool or interface for sending correctly formatted > patches? > This

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH ovs v2] debian/rules: Fix incorrect use of link-time optimizer.

2024-01-03 Thread Aaron Conole
Roberto Bartzen Acosta via dev writes: > Current version of debian/rules simply uses the default lto GCC > optimization settings during the linkage process. > > The main problem with this approach is that GCC on OS like Ubuntu Jammy, > for example, can enable the -flto=auto option during the open

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH ovs v2] debian/rules: Fix incorrect use of link-time optimizer.

2023-12-22 Thread 0-day Robot
Bleep bloop. Greetings Roberto Bartzen Acosta, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch. Thanks for your contribution. I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below. git-am: error: patch failed: debian/rules:2 error: debian/rules: patch does not apply error: Did

[ovs-dev] [PATCH ovs v2] debian/rules: Fix incorrect use of link-time optimizer.

2023-12-22 Thread Roberto Bartzen Acosta via dev
Current version of debian/rules simply uses the default lto GCC optimization settings during the linkage process. The main problem with this approach is that GCC on OS like Ubuntu Jammy, for example, can enable the -flto=auto option during the openvswitch building and linking process. In this case