eaks . We can widely review the
> >> other part of the code as it might require more indepth testing and review.
> >>
> >> What are your suggestions ?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Anju
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> F
of the code as it might require more indepth testing and review.
> >>
> >> What are your suggestions ?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Anju
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:blp at ovn.org]
> >&
>> From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:blp at ovn.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 11:39 PM
>> To: Stokes, Ian
>> Cc: Lam, Tiago ; Anju Thomas > ericsson.com>; dev at openvswitch.org
>> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] Fix crash due to multiple tn
Thanks Ben.
Regards
Anju
-Original Message-
From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 5:24 AM
To: Anju Thomas
Cc: Stokes, Ian ; Lam, Tiago ;
d...@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] Fix crash due to multiple tnl push action
OK. I applied
-Original Message-
> From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 11:39 PM
> To: Stokes, Ian
> Cc: Lam, Tiago ; Anju Thomas ;
> d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] Fix crash due to multiple tnl push action
>
&
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] Fix crash due to multiple tnl push action
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:38:38AM +, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > On 16/01/2019 09:30, Anju Thomas wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > Are these changes planned to be merged as well?
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:38:38AM +, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > On 16/01/2019 09:30, Anju Thomas wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > Are these changes planned to be merged as well?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Anju
> >
> > Hi Anju,
> >
> > Unfortunately, no. An RFC based on the below was
] [PATCH v1] Fix crash due to multiple tnl push action
> On 16/01/2019 09:30, Anju Thomas wrote:
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Are these changes planned to be merged as well?
> >
> > Regards
> > Anju
>
> Hi Anju,
>
> Unfortunately, no. An RFC based
> On 16/01/2019 09:30, Anju Thomas wrote:
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Are these changes planned to be merged as well?
> >
> > Regards
> > Anju
>
> Hi Anju,
>
> Unfortunately, no. An RFC based on the below was proposed to the mailing
> list here [1], but no discussion / comments happened after
: d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] Fix crash due to multiple tnl push action
>
> On 25/06/2018 13:15, Anju Thomas wrote:
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> We are facing multiple such crashes on different computes in our
>> deployments. Seems to be a pretty commo
Hi Folks,
Are these changes planned to be merged as well?
Regards
Anju
-Original Message-
From: Lam, Tiago [mailto:tiago@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 11:27 PM
To: Anju Thomas ; Ben Pfaff
Cc: d...@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] Fix crash due
On 25/06/2018 13:15, Anju Thomas wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> We are facing multiple such crashes on different computes in our deployments.
> Seems to be a pretty common problem in our setup. As you suggested, it would
> be good if we can make the below changes as well.How do you suggest we
>
& thanks
Anju
-Original Message-
From: Anju Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2018 10:26 AM
To: Ben Pfaff
Cc: d...@openvswitch.org
Subject: RE: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] Fix crash due to multiple tnl push action
Hi ,
Any suggestions ?
Will it be ok if we merge the tunnel push change that we
c: d...@openvswitch.org
Subject: RE: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] Fix crash due to multiple tnl push action
Hi Ben,
I was working on the code changes and I can think of two approaches we can take
to prevent this crash in the dpdk datapath.
1. Today the dp_packet module that we have is never return any error . The
CH v1] Fix crash due to multiple tnl push action
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 08:51:03AM +, Anju Thomas wrote:
> It looks like your commit message describes at least two other bugs in
> OVS, though. First, if OVS crashes when it pushes tunnel headers,
> even if there's not enough headroom
; Anju
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 6:28 PM
> To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org; Anju Thomas <anju.tho...@ericsson.com>; Ben
> Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
> Cc: Tiago Lam <tiago@intel.com
.org; Anju Thomas <anju.tho...@ericsson.com>; Ben Pfaff
<b...@ovn.org>
Cc: Tiago Lam <tiago@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] Fix crash due to multiple tnl push action
Hello Anju, Ben,
Looks like I fixed a leak reported here in my recent patch:
https://mail.openvsw
Regards
> Anju
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:blp at ovn.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 2:00 AM
> To: Anju Thomas
> Cc: dev at openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] Fix crash due to multiple tnl push action
>
> On Thu, May 10
Hi Anju,
On 10/05/2018 09:51, Anju Thomas wrote:
[snip]
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 1:59 AM
> To: Anju Thomas <anju.tho...@ericsson.com>
> Cc: d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev]
Hi Ben,
I will work on these changes as well.
Regards
Anju
-Original Message-
From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 2:00 AM
To: Anju Thomas <anju.tho...@ericsson.com>
Cc: d...@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] Fix crash due to multip
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 08:51:03AM +, Anju Thomas wrote:
> It looks like your commit message describes at least two other bugs in
> OVS, though. First, if OVS crashes when it pushes tunnel headers,
> even if there's not enough headroom, that's really bad. At worst, it
> should drop the
Hi Ben,
Replies inline:
Regards & thanks
Anju
-Original Message-
From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 1:59 AM
To: Anju Thomas <anju.tho...@ericsson.com>
Cc: d...@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] Fix crash due to multiple tnl p
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 12:34:54AM +0530, Anju Thomas wrote:
> During slow path packet processing, if the action is to output to a
> tunnel port, the slow path processing of the encapsulated packet
> continues on the underlay bridge and additional actions (e.g. optional
> VLAN encapsulation, bond
During slow path packet processing, if the action is to output to a
tunnel port, the slow path processing of the encapsulated packet
continues on the underlay bridge and additional actions (e.g. optional
VLAN encapsulation, bond link selection and finally output to port) are
collected there.
To
24 matches
Mail list logo