On 12/6/21 02:49, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 8:15 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>
>> On 11/30/21 22:31, Mike Pattrick wrote:
>>> If anonymous memory mapping is supported by the kernel, it's better
>>> to run OVS entirely in memory rather than creating shared data
>>> structures. OVS
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 8:15 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 11/30/21 22:31, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> > If anonymous memory mapping is supported by the kernel, it's better
> > to run OVS entirely in memory rather than creating shared data
> > structures. OVS doesn't work in multi-process mode, so ther
On 11/30/21 22:31, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> If anonymous memory mapping is supported by the kernel, it's better
> to run OVS entirely in memory rather than creating shared data
> structures. OVS doesn't work in multi-process mode, so there is no need
> to litter a filesystem and experience random cra
Bleep bloop. Greetings Mike Pattrick, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
WARNING: Unexpected sign-offs from developers who are not authors or co-authors
or committers
If anonymous memory mapping is supported by the kernel, it's better
to run OVS entirely in memory rather than creating shared data
structures. OVS doesn't work in multi-process mode, so there is no need
to litter a filesystem and experience random crashes due to old memory
chunks stored in re-opene