Hi, I've already sent a v2 patch.
Mark Gray 于2021年2月17日周三 下午6:44写道：
>
> On 17/02/2021 10:40, 贺鹏 wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the review.
> >
> > Mark Gray 于2021年2月17日周三 下午6:13写道：
> >>
> >> I'm not too familiar with this code but I have some comments.
> >>
> >> On 15/02/2021 09:50, Peng He w
On 17/02/2021 10:40, 贺鹏 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> Mark Gray 于2021年2月17日周三 下午6:13写道：
>>
>> I'm not too familiar with this code but I have some comments.
>>
>> On 15/02/2021 09:50, Peng He wrote:
>>> CT zone could be set from a field that is not included in frozen
>>> metedata. C
Hi,
Thanks for the review.
Mark Gray 于2021年2月17日周三 下午6:13写道：
>
> I'm not too familiar with this code but I have some comments.
>
> On 15/02/2021 09:50, Peng He wrote:
> > CT zone could be set from a field that is not included in frozen
> > metedata. Consider the belowing cases which is normally
I'm not too familiar with this code but I have some comments.
On 15/02/2021 09:50, Peng He wrote:
> CT zone could be set from a field that is not included in frozen
> metedata. Consider the belowing cases which is normally used in
Nits:
s/metedata/metadata
s/belowing cases which is/cases below w
Bleep bloop. Greetings Peng He, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
ERROR: Author Peng He needs to sign off.
WARNING: Unexpected sign-offs from developers who are not a
CT zone could be set from a field that is not included in frozen
metedata. Consider the belowing cases which is normally used in
OpenStack security group rules:
priority=100,in_port=1,tcp,ct_state=-trk,action=ct(zone=5,table=0)
priority=100,in_port=1,tcp,ct_state=+trk,action=ct(commit,zone=NXM_NX_
