On 24 May 2023, at 21:05, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 5/23/23 15:11, Balazs Nemeth wrote:
>> The only way that stats->{n_packets,n_bytes} would decrease is due to an
>> overflow, or if there are bugs in how statistics are handled. In the
>> past, there were multiple issues that caused a jump
On 5/23/23 15:11, Balazs Nemeth wrote:
> The only way that stats->{n_packets,n_bytes} would decrease is due to an
> overflow, or if there are bugs in how statistics are handled. In the
> past, there were multiple issues that caused a jump backward. A
> workaround was in place to set the statistics
On 23 May 2023, at 15:11, Balazs Nemeth wrote:
> The only way that stats->{n_packets,n_bytes} would decrease is due to an
> overflow, or if there are bugs in how statistics are handled. In the
> past, there were multiple issues that caused a jump backward. A
> workaround was in place to set
The only way that stats->{n_packets,n_bytes} would decrease is due to an
overflow, or if there are bugs in how statistics are handled. In the
past, there were multiple issues that caused a jump backward. A
workaround was in place to set the statistics to 0 in that case. When
this happened while
