Hi Ilya,
Thanks for the comments, my replies are in-line.
On 17/10/2018 17:30, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 10.10.2018 19:22, Tiago Lam wrote:
>> From: Mark Kavanagh
>>
>> There are numerous factors that must be considered when calculating
>> the size of an mbuf:
>> - the data portion of the mbuf m
On 10.10.2018 19:22, Tiago Lam wrote:
> From: Mark Kavanagh
>
> There are numerous factors that must be considered when calculating
> the size of an mbuf:
> - the data portion of the mbuf must be sized in accordance With Rx
> buffer alignment (typically 1024B). So, for example, in order to
>
On 16/10/2018 14:46, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>> From: Mark Kavanagh
>>
>> There are numerous factors that must be considered when calculating the
>> size of an mbuf:
>> - the data portion of the mbuf must be sized in accordance With Rx
>> buffer alignment (typically 1024B). So, for example, in order
> From: Mark Kavanagh
>
> There are numerous factors that must be considered when calculating the
> size of an mbuf:
> - the data portion of the mbuf must be sized in accordance With Rx
> buffer alignment (typically 1024B). So, for example, in order to
> successfully receive and capture a 150
From: Mark Kavanagh
There are numerous factors that must be considered when calculating
the size of an mbuf:
- the data portion of the mbuf must be sized in accordance With Rx
buffer alignment (typically 1024B). So, for example, in order to
successfully receive and capture a 1500B packet, mbu
