Hi Ian,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stokes, Ian
> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 2:19 PM
> To: O Mahony, Billy <billy.o.mah...@intel.com>; d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: RE: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] dpif-netdev: Assign ports to pmds on non-
> local numa node.
>
> To: Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; d...@openvswitch.org
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] dpif-netdev: Assign ports to pmds on
> > non- local numa node.
> >
> > Thanks Ian,
> >
> > I'll incorporate these suggestions in a new patch version.
>
o...@intel.com>; d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] dpif-netdev: Assign ports to pmds on non-
> local numa node.
>
> Thanks Ian,
>
> I'll incorporate these suggestions in a new patch version.
>
> Cheers,
> Billy.
>
> > -Original Message-
&g
PATCH v2] dpif-netdev: Assign ports to pmds on non-
> local numa node.
>
> > Previously if there is no available (non-isolated) pmd on the numa
> > node for a port then the port is not polled at all. This can result in
> > a non- operational system until such
> Previously if there is no available (non-isolated) pmd on the numa node
> for a port then the port is not polled at all. This can result in a non-
> operational system until such time as nics are physically repositioned. It
> is preferable to operate with a pmd on the 'wrong' numa node albeit
From: billyom
Previously if there is no available (non-isolated) pmd on the numa node
for a port then the port is not polled at all. This can result in a
non-operational system until such time as nics are physically
repositioned. It is preferable to operate with a pmd