Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] rhel: user/group openvswitch does not exist

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > I can certainly re-add it. The rationale section calls adding the 'exit > 0' "...suboptimal but has less potential for system wide breakage..." > > I can go either way. Maybe Alan or Timothy have opinions? I'd stick to

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] rhel: user/group openvswitch does not exist

Markos Chandras writes: > Hi Aaron, > > On 18/04/18 15:51, Aaron Conole wrote: >> v2: >> * Removed the requires(post) lines >> * Removed 'exit 0' > > I realize that I was the one suggested to drop 'exit 0', but right at > the bottom of >

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] rhel: user/group openvswitch does not exist

Hi Aaron, On 18/04/18 15:51, Aaron Conole wrote: > v2: > * Removed the requires(post) lines > * Removed 'exit 0' I realize that I was the one suggested to drop 'exit 0', but right at the bottom of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups#Dynamic_allocation it seems that 'exit

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] rhel: user/group openvswitch does not exist

From: Alan Pevec Default ownership[1] for config files is failing on an empty system: Running scriptlet: openvswitch-2.9.0-3.fc28.x86_64 warning: user openvswitch does not exist - using root warning: group openvswitch does not exist - using root ... Required user/group