On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> I can certainly re-add it. The rationale section calls adding the 'exit
> 0' "...suboptimal but has less potential for system wide breakage..."
>
> I can go either way. Maybe Alan or Timothy have opinions?
I'd stick to Fedora guideline.
Al
Markos Chandras writes:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> On 18/04/18 15:51, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> v2:
>> * Removed the requires(post) lines
>> * Removed 'exit 0'
>
> I realize that I was the one suggested to drop 'exit 0', but right at
> the bottom of
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups#D
Hi Aaron,
On 18/04/18 15:51, Aaron Conole wrote:
> v2:
> * Removed the requires(post) lines
> * Removed 'exit 0'
I realize that I was the one suggested to drop 'exit 0', but right at
the bottom of
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups#Dynamic_allocation
it seems that 'exit 0'
From: Alan Pevec
Default ownership[1] for config files is failing on an empty system:
Running scriptlet: openvswitch-2.9.0-3.fc28.x86_64
warning: user openvswitch does not exist - using root
warning: group openvswitch does not exist - using root
...
Required user/group need to be created in %p